Honk honk!!

Something old, something new, something borrowed, something purple!

A club member brings me interesting models for upgrade. This time, he brought me a very new British model and a very old American model.

My friend and fellow club member collects largely British models. This time, he had me upgrade a stout little 2-6-0 steam locomotive manufactured by UK Bachmann. It was made mostly well, but their use of the 21-pin decoder system annoyed me. These little steamers’ little tenders need room for a decoder, a speaker, and a capacitor. 21-pin decoders are thin but wide, and their connectors make their geometry taller than necessary. I removed that in lieu of a TSU-1100. Doing so left plenty of room for a capacitor. A speaker was already inconspicuously supplied within the bottom of the tender. With plentiful space, the hard wiring was a breeze!

My client brought me another model dating to 1975. It is a well-known Tyco Chattanooga, known for little quirks, engine mechanism problems, and general finickiness. It’s a reputation well earned!

There was no working backlight in the tender from the manufacturer, so I melted a hole into the fake backlight to make room for an LED. That’s not bad for a fifty-one year old model!

Evolution of the Union Pacific’s Steam Giants

For many railroad enthusiasts, the Union Pacific Big Boy represents the pinnacle of American steam locomotive design.  Its sheer size, remarkable power, and modern-day return to service have made it a railroading icon.  Yet the Big Boy did not appear in isolation.  It was the culmination of more than two decades of engineering development, during which Union Pacific continually sought to move heavier freight trains over the steep grades of the American West with greater speed, efficiency, and reliability.

Beginning with the rugged Bull Moose in 1918, the innovative 9000 class in 1926, the versatile Challenger in 1936, and finally the legendary Big Boy in 1941, Union Pacific refined the art of heavy freight steam power into what many historians consider the highest achievement of the American steam era.


The Problem

Unlike many eastern railroads, Union Pacific crossed some of the most demanding terrain in the continental United States.  Long grades across Wyoming’s Sherman Hill and Utah’s Wasatch Mountains challenged locomotives to haul increasingly heavy freight trains over difficult mountain districts while maintaining efficient schedules.

Each generation of locomotive was another attempt to solve the same fundamental question: how can increasingly heavier trains move faster over the mountains without increasing expense?

The answer evolved dramatically between 1918 and 1944.


The Bull Moose, The Greatgrandparent (1918–1924)

The nickname “Bull Moose” was affectionately given by Union Pacific crews to the railroad’s fleet of 2-8-8-0 articulated Mallet locomotives.  Between 1918 and 1924, the American Locomotive Company (ALCO) built seventy-five examples for Union Pacific.

Designed specifically for mountain freight service, these locomotives possessed tremendous pulling power but sacrificed speed.  Their primary purpose was to haul long freight trains over steep grades where brute force mattered far more than velocity.

Compound Articulation

The Bull Moose was originally built as a compound Mallet.

Instead of sending fresh boiler steam to all four cylinders simultaneously, steam first entered two smaller high-pressure cylinders before exhausting into two larger low-pressure cylinders.  This arrangement extracted additional energy from the steam and improved fuel economy during slow-speed operation.

While efficient, compound operation made the locomotives mechanically complex and somewhat sluggish when accelerating. Acceleration may be only one part of a train’s trip, but it’s a very important part of time spent traveling. “Time is money” to all railroads, be they commercial freight, commercial passenger, or leisurely excursion railroads.

Rebuilding the Bull Moose

Beginning in the late 1930s, Union Pacific modernized much of the fleet.

Major improvements included:

  • Conversion from compound to simple-expansion cylinders
  • Larger 59-inch driving wheels
  • Feedwater heaters
  • Mechanical refinements throughout the locomotive
  • Conversion of many locomotives from coal to oil firing
  • Improved, more efficient application of power

These rebuilt locomotives’ significant upgrade in power application and efficiency made them valuable mountain freight engines through the late nineteen forties.


The “Nines” 9000 Class, A Completely Different Solution (1926–1930)

Rather than constructing an even larger articulated locomotive, Union Pacific engineers pursued a radically different approach known today simply as “the Nines”.

Between 1926 and 1930, ALCO produced eighty-eight 4-12-2 locomotives that remain the only largely successful production three-cylinder steam locomotives built for regular service in North America.

A Worthwhile Note: The 9000s were the most famous example of large, three-cylinder steam locomotives, but they were not the first. Their immediate predecessors are the ten 4-10-2 “Overland” 8000s built in 1925. The Overlands were experimental prototypes of a concept that paved the way for the Nines. They hauled heavy freight trains over the famous Overland Route in addition to the Overland Limited passenger train. The Overlands were overshadowed by the Nines relatively soon, having a service date range of about seventeen years before being converted to two-cylinder operation.

Three Cylinders Instead of Four

Unlike virtually every other large American steam locomotive, the 9000 included an additional inside cylinder located between the locomotive’s frames.

This third cylinder drove the second driving axle, producing smoother power delivery and reducing the stress placed upon the outside cylinders.

The design proved remarkably successful.

Although the Nines generated slightly less starting tractive effort than the rebuilt Bull Moose, it hauled nearly the same tonnage while maintaining speeds approaching 50 mph.  Faster trains meant increased capacity because locomotives spent less time occupying valuable main-line track.

The trade-off was flexibility.  With twelve coupled driving wheels mounted in a rigid frame, the Nines required exceptionally well-maintained track and generous curve radii.


The Challenger (1936–1944)

Combining Speed with Articulation

The Challenger represented one of the greatest advances in steam locomotive engineering in its time.

Instead of choosing between the flexibility of the Bull Moose and the speed of the Nines, Union Pacific engineers combined both strengths into a single locomotive.

The 4-6-6-4 Challenger was designed from the beginning as a simple articulated locomotive, eliminating the complicated compound steam system used by earlier Mallets.

This reduced maintenance while greatly improving high-speed performance.

A Freight Locomotive That Could Run Fast

Equipped with 69-inch drivers and operating at 255 pounds per square inch of boiler pressure, the Challenger comfortably hauled heavy freight between 50 and 70 mph.

For an articulated locomotive of its size, this was extraordinary.

Union Pacific eventually owned 105 Challengers, more than any railroad ever operated, making the design one of the most successful articulated freight locomotives in history.


The Big Boy (1941–1944)

The Mightiest Steam Freight Locomotive in the West

By the early 1940s, freight traffic continued to increase.

Union Pacific wanted a locomotive capable of hauling 3,600-ton freight trains over the Wasatch Mountains without helper locomotives.

ALCO answered with the now-famous 4-8-8-4 Big Boy.

Although visually similar to the Challenger, nearly every major component was enlarged.

Boiler pressure increased to 300 psi.

The locomotive weighed approximately 772,000 pounds by itself and more than 1.2 million pounds when coupled to its tender.

Starting tractive effort reached an astounding 135,375 pounds.

Despite its enormous size, the Big Boy remained surprisingly fast.  In regular freight service it commonly operated at speeds between 45 and 70 mph, with credible reports suggesting somewhat higher speeds under exceptional circumstances.

Only twenty-five Big Boys were built, yet eight survive today.  No. 4014 currently holds the distinction of being the world’s largest operating steam locomotive.


Union Pacific Heavy Freight Steam Chronology

1918: The first Bull Moose enters service, introducing large articulated freight power to Union Pacific.

1924: Construction of the Bull Moose fleet concludes.

1926: The first Nine-class locomotive is delivered, becoming the largest successful rigid-frame steam locomotive built in North America.

1930: Construction of the Nines concludes.

Late 1930s: Most Bull Moose are rebuilt from compound to simple articulated locomotives, receiving larger drivers and numerous mechanical improvements.

1936: The Challenger enters service and demonstrates that articulated locomotives can combine flexibility with sustained high-speed freight operation.

1941: The first Big Boy is delivered.

1944: Construction of both the Challenger and Big Boy concludes.

1947: Retirement of the Bull Moose fleet begins.

1953-1956: The Challenger and Nine fleets are gradually retired as diesel-electric locomotives assume their duties.

1959: The final Big Boys leave regular service.

11 August, 2016: Restoration of Big Boy 4014 begins.

1 May, 2019: The locomotive moved under its own steam for the first time since 1959 during test runs in Cheyenne.

4 May, 2019: Union Pacific formally unveiled the restored locomotive during a public ceremony in Cheyenne.

9 May, 2019: No. 4014 departed on its first public excursion, helping commemorate the 150th anniversary of the completion of the First Transcontinental Railroad at Promontory Summit, Utah. This is generally regarded as its official return to service.


Four Different Engineering Philosophies

One of the most fascinating aspects of these locomotives is that each solved the same operating problem in a different way.

The Bull Moose emphasized maximum pulling power.  Efficiency and low-speed tractive effort were paramount, making it ideal for mountain grades but relatively slow.

The 9000 class pursued speed through an immense rigid frame and an innovative three-cylinder arrangement.  It moved similar freight tonnage more quickly, increasing the railroad’s capacity without requiring additional track.

The Challenger united articulation with speed.  It could negotiate mountain curves while hauling heavy freight at speeds previously reserved for rigid-frame locomotives.

The Big Boy refined the Challenger’s concept into its ultimate form.  Rather than chasing higher top speeds, it focused on moving heavier trains over mountain grades without helper locomotives, pushing reciprocating steam technology to its practical limits.


Did You Know?

The Bull Moose Wasn’t Originally Called a Class

“Bull Moose” was a railroad nickname coined by Union Pacific crews rather than an official builder’s designation.

The 9000 Was Unique

The 9000 class remains the only successful production three-cylinder steam locomotive built for regular service in North America.

The Challenger Was Designed for Speed

Unlike earlier Mallets, the Challenger was designed from the outset as a high-speed articulated locomotive rather than being adapted from a slower freight design.

Eight Big Boys Survive

Of the twenty-five Big Boys constructed, eight escaped the scrapyard—an unusually high survival rate for large steam locomotives.


Legacy

Viewed together, these four locomotive classes illustrate one of the most remarkable engineering progressions in railroad history.

In just twenty-three years, Union Pacific advanced from the slow but immensely powerful Bull Moose to the Big Boy, a locomotive capable of hauling enormous freight trains over mountain grades at sustained main-line speeds.

Each generation built directly upon the lessons learned from its predecessor.  The Bull Moose proved the value of articulation with heavy freight over mountainous terrain.  The 9000 demonstrated that immense freight locomotives could also be fast.  The Challenger successfully combined those ideas into one versatile design.  Finally, the Big Boy refined that formula into what many historians consider the ultimate expression of American steam locomotive engineering.

Today, although only the Big Boy survives in significant numbers, the legacy of every one of these locomotive classes lives on.  Together they transformed freight transportation across the American West and helped define the final golden age of steam.

Mulligan made me stop for luvins.
BLI designed the resonating enclosure for its 8Ohm 2Watt speaker very well!

You’ve Got A Friend In Me

I’ve often said that IHC models are my favorites. They are simple, fairly durable, and usually easily upgraded. I don’t often like diesel-electrics, but I couldn’t pass by a Toy Story set. “Toy Story” has defined several generations of childhood and cinematic history, and this little piece of childhood tugged at my heartstrings.

This livery is simple but tasteful!

Many simple models have the lights, motor, and wheels/axels wired in parallel for even power distribution. Those are the first things I isolate.

I replaced the truck-mounted incandescent bulbs with LEDs mounted in the cab and rear engine body ceiling.

I often use UV hardening gel for LED fastening. The bumpy panel is a UV plant growing light block. It’s very handy for model train work.

This is shows all the wiring I added. I wove the wires in just such a way that certain ones are taught and hold the others away from moving parts. This model uses a LaisDCC capacitor. A TCS KA2 and KA4 are barely too large, and the KA-N1 isn’t enough supplementary power for this HO model.

I routed the track power and LED connections into the hood nose to save space in the rear for the capacitor.

Narrowing Things Down

I’ll post more about my suspended layout, later, but I want to mention some other things I’ve been doing of late.

Primarily, I’ve been working with HOn3 narrow gauge steam locomotives.  Bill is a cliet from the Detroit, Michigan, area, and he has had me busy upgrading his Blackstone steam locomotives with KeepAlive.  Blackstone is a division of SoundTraxx, and it specializes in American narrow gauge model railroading.  They are also known for their quality of live, recorded sound.  All Blackstone steam locomotives are equipped with DCC Tsunami sound and DC/DCC compatibility, but they are not equipped with KeepAlive.  Bill has had me upgrading his locomotives with Tsunami 2 and SoundTraxx’s trademarked CurrentKeeper.  The CurrentKeeper stores electrical energy that suppliments power to the decoder when the locomotive and tender cross dead spots, dirty spots, or “imperfect” trackwork.  Depending on the size of the locomotive, the sophistication of its motor, and whatever else may be going on with the locomotive, the CurrentKeeper can maintain power for eight to twenty-five seconds.  It’s pretty great.  I once timed it with the locomotive simply idling.  There were no head- or back lamps lit, no sounds sounding, no motor moving; it was pure idle and die.  I timed 25.66 seconds after I removed it from the rails and before it finally died.  It’s pretty great!

Below is a Blackstone C-19 steamer.  It had no original number so I called it “Lil’ Blue”.img_6582img_6581img_6580img_6567

Rather than keep all the wires in one housing block, I separate the rail-pickups.  This is more compactable and less confusing in the longrun.img_6568img_6569

I use Dupont crimp-style wire connectors to avoid soldering and possibly burning right through the tiny wire.  I also paint the connector housing with white-out and label the wires individually so I know what is where.img_6570

C-19’s are pretty small, even for narrow gauge, so I am limited to how I can fit everything into one space.img_6573img_6566

The original wires are all black, so I requested a wiring diagram from SoundTraxx.img_6572

This stuff is AMAZING!!  It’s a  welding gel that hardens and cures when exposed to UV light.  It cures and hardens in about five seconds, so it’s great for temporary placeholding (coupler assembly) and permenant placeholding (loose wires).img_6574

Between HOn3 upgrades, I installed DCC in an HO Rivarrossi 2-6-6-6 Allegheny articulated steam locomotive.  One of my fellow model train club (Crawford County Model Railroaders) members asked me to install this for him.  It’s one of his abolute favorite locomotives, and he wanted to be sure it would be done correctly.  I installed a Train Control Systems Wow101-KA-Steam decoder.  TCS is known for their superior slow and fine motor control and their “Goof-Proof” warranty.  I’ve always been very pleased with TCS’s products and customer service.  The finished installation sounds fantastic, and their audio-assist programming feature in their larger, higher-end decoders is a beautufily designed consumer-friendly tool.  They also offer multiple designs of KeepAlive.

Fun fact about the Allegheny:  it was more powerful than the Big Boy by 1,210 HP!!!

 

Another thing I’ve been doing is Frankensteining a custome N scale locomotive.  I started with an old Con-Cor 2-8-8-2 Y6B.  I took the shell off and insulated the motor, removed the original little headlamp, and unsoldered the motor-to-track power leads.  The Y6B started as DC, but I’m converting it to DCC.  I plan to use a Train Control Systems Wow101-KA-Steam sound decoder.  It’s designed as an HO scale decoder, but it just fits inside the auxilary tender I’m going to add to the locomotive.  Most steam locomotives use only one tender, but they can use one or two extras for longer trips, or trips that will require much more than the usual amount of fuel.  In this case, the decoder I’m using includes TCS’s KeepAlive.  I will be using two speakers—one in each tender–and have several lights in the locomotive tenders.  With all those wires and speakers, the original tender isn’t large enough, so I’m adding a Bachmann tender from a 4-8-4 Northern steam locomotive.  The additional tender is larger than the original, so the initial decoder, one speaker, and two 3-millimiter LED’s will go in it.  The KeepAlive, wires for the head lamp, and another LED will go in the original tender.

img_6545img_6547img_6548

I’m not using a caboose as a tender.  I was going to tack it on behind the second tender and wire it to draw power from both rails, but I decided this would be gawdy enough without it.  I will probably use it with The Lilliputian.img_6550

This new locomotive will be called “The Livingston”.  It will be repaitned in Baltimore & Ohio Railroad royal blue and antique gold with some silver trim, and it will be primarily a passenger train.  I’m also repainting and repurposing two old Con-Cor heavyweight passenger sets, a small three-car Rivarrossi passenger set, and an extra observation car to match.  Normally, the Y6B wouldn’t be able to haul all those at once without a helper engine, but I’m adding GO2 glue to all sixteen drivers to bolster her hauling power.  GO2 glue is perfect for adding traction to driver wheels because it doesn’t run during application, it dries crystal clear, it’s shock resistant, and it’s temperature hardy.  You won’t see it after it’s been applied and has set, and what little dirt it might pick up and show from the rails just makes everything look more protoptycial.  The only drawback is that it nearly completely degrades the elcctrical pick-up abilities of driver wheels, so I must draw power through another medium.  That is another function of the second tender.  The first tender will draw only from the right rail, and the second will draw only from the left.

 

I have also started creating a sister locomotive called “The Lilliputian”.  She will be much smaller than her big sister; she is an Atlas 0-4-0 steam switcher.  The Lilliputian won’t have lights because the engine is just so small.  It is so small, that I must wire a passenger car to permenantly follow the tender.  Adding the GO2 stops the pick-up of the engine wheels, altogether, and the tender draws only from one rail.  It can’t be insulated to do both.  That is one of the functions of the passenger car; the car will also house the decoder, KeepAlive, and mini cube speaker.  I am not sure whether I will use TCS or SoundTraxx for the decoder, but I am sure I will TCS’s KA4-C KeepAlive.  SoundTraxx’s CurrentKeeper is dimensionally too long.

This is roughly how The Lilliputian will look when finished.img_1294

I had to replace the original tender pick-up flanges to better suite the re-orienting of the trucks to avoid contacting metal parts of the chassis.img_1290

I created a new drawbar out of plain plastic, and I painted it matte black.  The wire that leads from the rear truck to the decoder winds half-way around the drawbar and up through the step platform.img_1291

The wire will then lead through the door of the passenger car as inconspicuously as possible.img_1292

 

The Livingston is clearly more powerful and likes to show off, but The Lilliputian doing the same thing looks more impressive!

With all the HOn3 upgrading I’ve been doing, I’ve not had enough free time at once to work on my suspended Z scale layout.  Oh, well.  In due time…

It’s All About the Curves

Hey, All!

Happy early Thanksgiving!  It’s beginning to really feel like winter here in Texas.  I’ve been doing some layout building and designing of sorts.  I helped a client lay some flex track for his suspended HO layout, and it turned out really well.

Von Irwin has a beautiful O gauge layout in his master bedroom.  I don’t how many hours he’s spent building it, but they have been hours very well spent.  He had a friend of his install suspension cables that run down from his attic through the ceiling to hold up his single-loop layout.  It has part of a town, a small military compound, and one siding on it.  Laying the track was simple, but laying everything in a wide enough radius for his Big Boy was a challenge.  Most minimum radii for Big Boys are 24″, and the diameter of the layout was probably 26″ or 28″. Some parts of the layout were cut unevenly, so the track ties come up flush with the edge.  I had to be creative in measuring certain points of curves, especially at the turnout.  The turnout is curved, so I couldn’t form it to the edge of the layout like the flex track.  It is fortunate that the model Big Boys’ driver trucks are both articulated instead of just the front one as is prototypical. It still hangs pretty far over–nearly an inch in a couple places–but makes all the curves and the turnout.

I’m pretty jealous of Von’s train room.  I love the wall-to-wall loops up high.IMG_0960

One of my favorite things about Von’s layout is how he has everything well-protected.  He has chicken wire mesh fastened to the underside of the layout and to the clear plastic retaining walls.  Even if something were to derail or be knocked off, the mesh would save it.IMG_0959IMG_0958IMG_0957IMG_0956IMG_0955IMG_0954IMG_0953IMG_0952IMG_0950IMG_0948

 

IMG_0947

Lights! Camera! Action!

 

There are these things called cameras.  They can be installed on or in locomotives, flat bed cars, or whatever you want!  Lately, I have made a project of installing a long-distance capable drone camera into the cab of an HO Amtrak diesel and the boiler faceplate of a G Lionel Rail Scope steamer.  So far, I am very pleased with my work.

IMG_3161

I initially considered installing the camera in my Chessapeke and Ohio BL2 diesel, but there was not enough room.IMG_3158IMG_3157

The camera fit very well in the front of my Amtrak diesel.  It looks weird, as if the engine has a big nose, but it works very well.  I may paint over part of the camera lense encasing to make it blend and match the color scheme.IMG_3160Not in the photo is a makeshift wooden sprung bumper that I installed for the camera’s safety.  If this were to fall any distance and land face first, the camera would surely be ruined.  The bumper extends about an inch from the frontmost point of the engine shell.  I dismantled a couple of mechanical pensils and used their lead casings, springs, and a piece of basla wood as buffers.

 

IMG_3156It just happened that the propogating antenna was the perfect size to fit in the steam locomotive’s dome.  I was going to run wiring through the cab, but this saves on wiring going every which way.

 

IMG_3155IMG_3154IMG_3153IMG_3152

I was super pleased with how similarly sized the old and new cameras were.  The new one took some form fitting to fit the frame of the faceplate, but it came together very nicely.  I am still working on extending the camera power supply wiring back to the cab.  I am also toying with varius LED bulbs in and around the locomotive.  Who knows?  I may even install a smoke unit and sound decoder.  The more I think about it, the more I realize that I am going to have one souped up little tank engine.

Don’t mind my hairy stomach.  It’s Texas.  It’s hot, and a singular window air conditioning unit doesn’t always cut it when the room is attached to an oven of a garage.

 

 

One very new development in my train goings-on is my parting of ways from HobbyTown USA.  I am now my own boss and run my own model train repair business!  It is appropriately named “Livingston Lines” to match this blog.  I am very excited to start this new endeavor, and I look forward to serving my model railroading community!  My Facebook business page is searchable via @livingstonlines, and my business e-mail address is livingstonlines@gmail.com.

Good change is afoot!!!